Melbourne's bench outscored Adelaide's by 30 points despite the 36ers' win
Run cost: US$1.77 at API prices (run on a Claude subscription) · + US$0.44 demo re-judging (judge re-run after the run finished)
Melbourne's bench scored 52 points to Adelaide's 22, a gap of 30 in Melbourne's favour, in the 97-95 Adelaide win. Jacob Rigoni started for Adelaide (8 points, 5 rebounds, 3 steals in 24:41), so credit for him is not bench production. Adelaide's starters scored 75 of its 97 points. Bench totals are summed from player rows by the starter flag.
shippedbroadcastproducers
How we know · rechecked by code
select sum(case when team_name='Melbourne United' and starter=0 then points else 0 end) - sum(case when team_name='Adelaide 36ers' and starter=0 then points else 0 end) as bench_gap from box_player where match_id='36dbeb55-58ad-11f1-a69b-43a6b5595d3e'
Evidence recorded without a quote. stats · source · match_id=36dbeb55-58ad-11f1-a69b-43a6b5595d3e; name=Jacob Rigoni (starter=1, points=8)
Evidence recorded without a quote. stats · source · match_id=36dbeb55-58ad-11f1-a69b-43a6b5595d3e; team_name=Melbourne United; starter=0 rows (Cole Anthony 30 points)
Evidence recorded without a quote. stats · source · match_id=36dbeb55-58ad-11f1-a69b-43a6b5595d3e; team_name=Adelaide 36ers; starter=0 rows (Kenyon 8, White 10, Rasmussen 2, Griscti 2, Williams 0)
Suggested follow-ups
Rarity
In box scores since 2015-16, how many NBL games has a team won while its bench was outscored by 30 or more points?
It shows whether winning while losing the bench battle by 30 is genuinely unusual, which is what makes this a strong broadcast stat.
python -m storydesk run follow_up --game 36dbeb55-58ad-11f1-a69b-43a6b5595d3e --anchor 34 --question "In box scores since 2015-16, how many NBL games has a team won while its bench was outscored by 30 or more points?" --live
Context
From box_player, which Adelaide players logged no minutes or limited minutes (for example Cameron, Humphries, Jenkins), and how many minutes did the starters play compared with Melbourne's starters?
It explains why the gap happened (a short rotation versus a deep one) instead of just reporting it.
python -m storydesk run follow_up --game 36dbeb55-58ad-11f1-a69b-43a6b5595d3e --anchor 34 --question "From box_player, which Adelaide players logged no minutes or limited minutes (for example Cameron, Humphries, Jenkins), and how many minutes did the starters play compared with Melbourne's starters?" --live
Comparison
How did coverage in the corpus before the cutoff describe Melbourne's depth, such as the 'United depth shines' Blitz piece, and does this game match that framing?
It links the stat to an existing preseason storyline that producers can call back to.
python -m storydesk run follow_up --game 36dbeb55-58ad-11f1-a69b-43a6b5595d3e --anchor 34 --question "How did coverage in the corpus before the cutoff describe Melbourne's depth, such as the 'United depth shines' Blitz piece, and does this game match that framing?" --live
Follow-up requests
Melbourne's bench outscored Adelaide's by 30 and they still lost. How rare is it for a team to win while losing the bench battle by that much, league-wide since 2015-16? And is Adelaide leaning this hard on its starters (75 of their 97 points) normal for them, or new under Gleeson? · asked by NBL Now producer Answered in run 7.